“I’m not seeing any Bonghitters. Very disappointed.” I was in Central Park with Andrew Fedorov, reporter for The Fine Print, to see a game of softball between the Bonghitters, fielded by The High Times, and The Wall Street Journal. (It wasn’t just the stoners: A call to the league’s commissioner revealed the game had been rained out.) He’s been covering the games for years, and working at TFP since 2021, as party reporter, features writer, industry correspondent, and interviewer. His pieces run weekly, and sometimes more often: By any estimate he’s one of the most hard-working and versatile writers in New York.
It’s from his scene reporting that I first met him, and it is this that accounts for his own newsworthiness. Writers’ social skills are often desultory, and they are given to backbiting and cruelty. They mock. I’ve heard some unpleasant things said about him, albeit generally using the mononym, that most reliable index of influence: A typical party report includes dozens of names. Writers and editors are more reluctant to admit they have looked for their own names in his pieces than to confess Googling themselves, filing late, or various types of infidelity.
Fedorov on his method: “If I go to a thing, I will go up to the host and be like, ‘Hey, will you play proper nouns [with me]?’ And they will just point out all the people, and they’re like, ‘You should talk to this person. They have something fun going on.’ And then I go to people, and I’m like, ‘Hey, what’s your name? How do you spell it?’ It’s totally random.” He took a break from the social column, “Vital Moments,” over the summer, because he had started feeling “a little paranoid,” like he “was going everywhere having an evil eye.”
People sometimes wouldn’t talk to him at parties. A briefly-notorious saloniste claimed he “didn’t realize” Fedorov was “recording the whole time,” because he regretted what he’d said.
TFP operates from a sense of public interest, unlike Gawker (middling) or Bookforum’s Paper Trail (Publishers Lunch-y). Significant stories from Fedorov include Erin Overby’s difficulties after she shared diversity statistics at The New Yorker, her employer; a rocky period at The Baffler; and what Julian Barnes (Times reporter) thinks about having the same name as Julian Barnes (award-bespangled novelist). TFP is intended for people who work in media, and it does affect how accountable they feel for what they publish and how they treat their workers, colleagues, and readers. A few days later, a friend asked what the name for Fedorov fans would be, and I proposed “the Fedoyeen.” I count myself among them.
I went about my own duties with Fedorov’s warnings and pointers in mind. But summer is lazy. Some columnists are lazy. Friend and editor at The Baffler Matthew Shen-Goodman took me to see my first professional fight, making up for the rained-out softball game. It was also my first time at Madison Square Garden. I discovered Muhammad Ali’s grandson, Biaggio Ali Walsh, has a tattoo on his chest that says “Arabic” in Arabic. Flava Flav was there. Midway through the card someone a couple rows back vomited so fantastically he cleared our entire section, which would have been a great time for the city to demolish the place.
I heard Dissent was throwing a party at their Wall Street office. After, a fellow attendee remarked, “That was the worst thing I’ve ever been to,” and he would know. They do have a terrace overlooking the East River, which made me feel like a passenger on an Air America flight: Lovely view, distressing atmosphere. Christian Lorentzen’s arrival, soon after his return from Albania, was applauded, and he obligingly doled out duty-free cigarettes and made a pass at a friend of mine. I overheard some unpleasant things about conditions at Harper’s from a fellow attendee, but this source was optimistic about the incoming editor, Chris Carroll. Here I’m inclined to apply The Paris Review rule: Replacing the current editor with someone who shares their first name guarantees improvement.
Speaking of, TPR throws the best parties in the city. I got a ride home with a couple editors from the New Yorker, but found myself unable to grill them thoroughly since what makes TPR parties great are free and recklessly strong drinks. They also have Dan Piepenbring, whose recent accession to the book column at Harper’s has already made it the finest going. Danielle Carr had a party later that week, possibly celebrating her return to Los Angeles, but also plausibly for the publication of her excellent piece on Bessel Van der Kolk in New York. An editor of a prominent little magazine autopsied the worst pieces in their forthcoming issue, because I asked, but I’ll spare them this time. Semper vigilans.
I increasingly suspect that Triple Canopy is the best magazine in New York, if only because it’s the one that, to borrow a friend’s phrase, feels the least like “an adult lemonade stand.” They hosted a panel to discussed the artist Darren Bader’s attempt to sell his artistic practice. A short film from Pacho Velez, with title cards from Becca Abbe, the legal contract Bader had drawn up, and an essay are on the TC website. Rachel Ossip introduced the panel, including art historian Rachel Hunter Himes, Harvard professor David Levine, filmmaker James N. Kienitz Wilkins, TC founder Alexander Provan, and artist Dena Yago. One million dollars—the price set for Bader’s practice—doesn’t entitle the buyer to rights over his work to date (like a French horn filled with guacamole), but it would allow them to produce nearly anything they wanted as Bader. Levine remarked that he found the gambit unpersuasive until he considered it as a sincere business proposition: So long as it isn’t an artwork, “it’s a masterpiece.” Maybe opting out will be cool again.
In About Ed by Robert Glück (NYRB, November), one of his many lovers tells him something that would feel unearned in a book by any other writer: “[Y]ou possess a sophisticated creativity and gratitude for your life that is unusual.” Here, you’re delighted to agree. About Ed is the record of Glück’s life with another lover, Ed Aulerich-Sugai, and their friendship until his death from AIDS in 1994. It is an oneiric, lyrical book, suitable for a writer who describes himself as “a novelist working outside the genre.” Glück’s sense of humor is intact, albeit subdued: There are the rare, smaller jokes, familiar from his criticism and poetry, but the big laugh is how foolish we all are when we’re young, and how helpless throughout. The memoir is partly a dual künstlerroman (Aulerich-Sugai was becoming a painter, and Glück a writer), and much of the book is about how Glück’s vocation fails him in grief: